![]() "Quality is the parent, the source of all subjects and objects." - Robert Pirsig |
But How Do We Know What’s Good? [Or Best?],. .... You Just See It.Enthusiasts Of Book “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance” (ZMM), Will Find Solid Support For What Pirsig Says, In Henry Gurr’s Explanation (Theory) Of How Our Mind Works.Henry Gurr’s Theory Explanation Is Based On, => A General Problem Solving Brain’s, Automatically & Spontaneously Finding => Optimal, Best Or Near Best, Solutions To Life’s On Coming Problems.************************************************************************ To ZMM Enthusiasts … Pirsig’s ZMM has the beginnings of an “Explanation (Theory) Of How Our Mind Works”: FOR EXAMPLE => “But that which causes us to invent the analogues is Quality. Quality is the continuing stimulus which our environment puts upon us to create the world in which we live. All of it. Every last bit of it.”. Above it said "But how do we know what’s good?" [or Best?]
…And although Pirsig’s statements, which are effectively how best to use our mind are correct, it is valuable to be able to go deeper and at a more basic level, to understand just why Pirsig is correct,
…Thus I urge you to read further, and as you do so, I certainly hope that my Theory will make sense, and be illuminating in its own right.
Based On Direct Observation Of Our Mind At Work =>
In My General Theory of How Our Mind Works, Eventually You Will Understand These Components =>
.a) Uses Previous Optimal, “Best Or Near Best” Problem Solutions, already saved into memory, from which =>
. b) To Find—Build---Create: The NEXT Optimal, “Best Or Near Best” Solution, which is then saved to create an even better solution stored into memory,.
….2) Thus the Problem Solving Brain Will Typically And Creatively, Go Beyond Where It Is! And, thus, our brain’s observed ability to find Optimum Solutions (from where it is), means it will AUTOMATICALLY find BETTER from where it is, and hence move to NOVEL .. DE-NOVO .. Answers!!
Our Human Ability To See And Know ”What Is Good” , [Or See And Know What Is Best?], Is A Natural & Important Consequence Of Our Problem Solving Brain’s Built-In Ability To =>
The Above Ideas May At First Seem Unreasonable, and Thus You Promptly Resist and Reject:
I’m an unknown worker to the study of mind, and of course no match to the range of knowledge or experience professional philosophers or workers in mind. … However, I hope you can accept these new theory ideas from a newcomer, since often a Beginner’s Mind is a VIRTUE, when it comes to new or/and breakthrough ideas.
Since there is a whole lot more to be said, I will gladly send more information and answer your questions. To read further, I suggest you investigate my compact explanation, of “A General Theory of How Our Mind Works”, Click Here. Thanking you in advance for considering my ideas, and any reply you may care to make. PS: 'Similar to the above Owen Barfield’s Evolution Of Consciousness is supported by Henry Gurr’s How Our Mind Works
Sincerely Henry Gurr, Professor of Physics Emeritus,
POSTLOG: Henry Gurr’s Good Friend French Professor Stanley Levine, After Reading The Above, Had These Observations => A) As we think about Darwinian Evolution, there is the problems of =>
…1) Why are older people, beyond their years of successful reproductive child-bearing, are still around?
…2) Problem of Aggressive People killing the Peaceful People. (Or problem of Selfish People grabbing all the resources for living
…3) The answer to above 1) => Older People, staying home contribute skilled work productions and are repository of needed knowledge & wisdom . Older People, especially Grand Parents, watch over and train the children,
…4) The answer to above 2) => Apparently Evolutionary EvoDevo, supports tow counteractive tendencies a) Opposing Selfish Behaviour, are the very real benefits of Cooperation! and b) There are the added benefits of Society, Socially Working Together, which gets added to Culture, and retained in Memory of Older People. Our own culture which has elections, for example.
…4) And, as Dr Levine is quick to point out => Our Problem Solving Brain’s Mental Arrival Optimal Solitons Into Conscious Mind => Are Constrained by what we know => From our surroundings, society, culture & language that we experienced as we grew up, from childhood thru to our current adult life. Examples => a) Some African Tribes only have words (and concepts) for 5 Colors: Red, Orange, Pink, Brown and Some Yellows And although the eyes of these tribal people can register all colors, their ability to distinguish & talk about color is limited to these 5 colors. Consequetntly they only “see” these five colors! b) Similarly, compared to English speakers, some Eskimo Tribes have a greater ability to distinguish various varieties of snow. For example Wikipedia says =>
Languages in the Inuit and Yupik language groups add suffixes to words to express the same concepts expressed in English and many other languages by means of compound words, phrases, and even entire sentences. One can create a practically unlimited number of new words in the Eskimoan languages on any topic, not just snow, and these same concepts can be expressed in other languages using combinations of words. In general and especially in this case, it is not necessarily meaningful to compare the number of words between languages that create words in different ways due to different grammatical structures.[4][8]
On the other hand, some anthropologists have argued that Boas, who lived among Baffin islanders and learned their language, did in fact take account of the polysynthetic nature of Inuit language and included "only words representing meaningful distinctions" in his account.[3] Igor Krupnik, an anthropologist at the Smithsonian Arctic Studies Center in Washington, supports Boas's work but notes that Boas was careful to include only words representing meaningful distinctions. Krupnik and others charted the vocabulary of about 10 Inuit and Yupik dialects and concluded that they indeed have many more words for snow than English does. Central Siberian Yupik has 40 terms. In Nunavimmiutitut, the Inuktitut dialect spoken in Canada's Nunavik region has at least 53, including matsaaruti, for wet snow that can be used to ice a sleigh's runners, and pukak, for crystalline powder snow that looks like salt. Within these dialects, the vocabulary associated with sea ice is even richer. In the Iñupiaq language of Wales, Alaska, Krupnik documented 70 terms for ice including: utuqaq, ice that lasts year after year; siguliaksraq, a patchwork layer of crystals that form as the sea begins to freeze; and auniq, ice that is filled with holes. Similarly, the Sámi peoples, who live in the northern tips of Scandinavia and Russia, use at least 180 words related to snow and ice, according to Ole Henrik Magga, a linguist in Norway. Unlike Inuit dialects, Sámi languages are not polysynthetic, making it easier to distinguish words.[9]
…5) Henry Gurr’s Theory Only Mentions UN-CONSCIOUS Brain Processes, But We All Need To Remember The Following Which Are At Variance With HSG Theory =>
…'The SUBCONSCIOUS and UNCONSCIOUS are both parts of the mind that are not immediately available to consciousness, but they have different functions and characteristics:
SUBCONSCIOUS:
UNCONSCIOUS: Stores memories, initial impressions, base instincts, and first experiences. Unconscious features include implicit memory, implicit perception, implicit thought and language, and implicit learning. Examples of unconscious events include suppressed feelings, auto reactions, complexes, and concealed phobias.
By Henry Gurr Email Dec 9 2024. Rev HSG pmWiki Dec 18-24 2024.
|
Recent Changes (All) | Edit Sidebar | Wiki Help | Page History | Edit Page | Powered by PmWiki |